Attitudes Towards Inclusion in the Context of ‘Intellectual Disability’: Demographic Characteristics of Attitude Types and How Social Privileges Might Lead to Denying Inclusion

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59519/mper6206

Keywords:

Inclusion, Attitudes, Intellectual disability, Social privileges, Disability

Abstract

The paper at hand presents results of the online survey "Attitude(s) towards inclusion" which inquires the attitudes of the German population towards inclusion in various life contexts (i.e., recreation, work, residence) with regard to people with ‘intellectual disabilities’1 . Extensive data were generated from a representative sample (n= 3695) which was analyzed using hierarchical cluster analysis and one-factorial analyses of variance. Here, we examine selected results that focus on the demographic parameters that influence people’s attitudes towards inclusion. Overall, we found a mostly positive and supportive attitude, especially among older demographic groups, female persons, persons with regular contact with people with ‘(intellectual) disabilities’, and voters of socially progressive parties2 . Notably, a small but distinct demographic group was identified that was rather unsympathetic towards inclusion. Significant characteristics of this group included being male, being well-educated and favoring socially conservative politics. The ensuing discussion implies that perhaps the negative attitudes towards inclusion held by this group are intertwined with the issue of social privileges.

References

Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature Of Prejudice. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W., & Weiber, R. (2018). Multivariate Analysemethoden. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung (15. Aufl). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Barát, E. (2022). Paradoxes of the Right-Wing Sexual/Gender Politics in Hungary: Right-Wing Populism and the Ban of Gender Studies. In: Möser, C., Ramme, J., Takács, J. (Eds.).

Paradoxical Right-Wing Sexual Politics in Europe. Global Queer Politics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan: 173-199.

Becker, H. (2016). … inklusive Arbeit! Das Recht auf Teilhabe an der Arbeitswelt auch für Menschen mit hohem Unterstützungsbedarf. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.

Betz, H. G. (2013). Mosques, minarets, burqas and other essential threats: The populist right’s campaign against Islam in Western Europe. In: Wodak, R., KhosraviNik, M., & Mral, B. (Eds.). Right-wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse. Bloomsbury Academic: 71-88.

Binnie, J. (2014). Neoliberalism, Class, Gender and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer Politics in Poland. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society (27): 241–257.

Black, L. L., & Stone, D. (2005). Expanding the definition of privilege: The concept of social privilege. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 33(4), 243-255.

Börner, M. (2023). Leben und Altern mit › geistiger Behinderung‹ : Biographische Einblicke und Perspektiven für Forschung und Handlungspraxis. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.

Chojnicka, J. (2015). Anti-EU and Anti-LGBT attitudes in Poland: Considering quantitative and qualitative evidence. TalTech Journal of European Studies 5(2), 30-55.

Cloerkes, G. (Ed.) (2007). Soziologie der Behinderten. Eine Einführung (3. Aufl.). Heidelberg: Winter.

Diekmann, A. (2023). Empirische sozialforschung: Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen (10. Aufl.). Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt GmbH.

Flynn, J., Carter, D. P., Hernández, L. H., & Hutson, G. (2023). Examining attitudes towards inclusion and social justice among US Climbers: analysis and findings from a national survey. Leisure Studies, 1-17.

Gasterstädt, J., & Urban, M. (2016). Einstellung zu Inklusion? Implikationen aus Sicht qualitativer Forschung im Kontext der Entwicklung inklusiver Schulen. Empirische Sonderpädagogik, 8(1), 54-66.

Griffin, M. M., Summer, A. H., McMillan, E. D., Day, T. L., & Hodapp, R. M. (2012). Attitudes toward including students with intellectual disabilities at college. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 9(4), 234-239.

Krzyżanowski, M. (2013). From anti-immigration and nationalist revisionism to Islamophobia: Continuities and shifts in recent discourses and patterns of political communication of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ). In: Wodak, R., KhosraviNik, M., & Mral, B. (Eds.). Right-wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse. Bloomsbury Academic: 135-148.

Kunz, A., Luder, R., & Moretti, M. (2010). Die Messung von Einstellungen zur Integration (EZI). Empirische Sonderpädagogik, 2(3), 83-94.

Nelissen, P. T., Hülsheger, U. R., van Ruitenbeek, G. M., & Zijlstra, F. R. (2016). How and when stereotypes relate to inclusive behavior toward people with disabilities. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(14), 1610-1625.

Pelinka, A. (2013). Right-wing populism: Concept and typology. In: Wodak, R., Khosravinik, M., & Mral, B. (Eds.). Right-wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse. Bloomsbury Academic: 3-22.

Schwab, S. (2015). Lehrersicht der sozialen Partizipation von Grundschülern: Ergebnisse einer Studie mit dem Lehrer Fragebogen zur Erfassung der sozialen Partizipation. Vierteljahresschrift für Heilpädagogik und ihre Nachbargebiete (VHN), 84 (1), 234 – 245.

Schwab, S., & Seifert, S. (2015). Einstellungen von Lehramtsstudierenden und Pädagogikstudierenden zur schulischen Inklusion–Ergebnisse einer quantitativen Untersuchung. Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung, 5(1), 73-87.

Scior, K., Addai‐Davis, J., Kenyon, M., & Sheridan, J. C. (2013). Stigma, public awareness about intellectual disability and attitudes to inclusion among different ethnic groups. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(11), 1014-1026.

Seifried, S., & Heyl, V. (2016). Konstruktion und Validierung eines Einstellungsfragebogens zu Inklusion für Lehrkräfte (EFI-L). Empirische Sonderpädagogik, 8(1), 22-35.

Trescher, H. (2015). Inklusion. Zur Dekonstruktion von Diskursteilhabebarrieren im Kontext von Freizeit und Behinderung. Wiesbaden: SpringerVS.

Trescher, H. (2017a). Wohnräume als pädagogische Herausforderung. Lebenslagen institutionalisiert lebender Menschen mit Behinderung (2. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: SpringerVS.

Trescher, H. (2017b). Behinderung als Praxis: Biographische Zugänge zu Lebensentwürfen von Menschen mit" geistiger Behinderung". Bielefeld: transcript.

Trescher, H. (2018). Ambivalenzen pädagogischen Handelns. Reflexionen der Betreuung von Menschen mit ‚geistiger Behinderung‘. Bielefeld: transcript.

Trescher, H., Lamby, A., & Börner, M. (2020). Einstellungen zu Inklusion im Kontext "geistiger Behinderung". Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Heilpädagogik, 26(2), 13-19.

Wu, K., & Dunning, D. (2020). Hypocognition and the invisibility of social privilege. Advances in group processes (37), 1-23.

Downloads

Published

18.11.2024

How to Cite

Attitudes Towards Inclusion in the Context of ‘Intellectual Disability’: Demographic Characteristics of Attitude Types and How Social Privileges Might Lead to Denying Inclusion. (2024). Multidisciplinarni Pristupi U Edukaciji I Rehabilitaciji, 6(8), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.59519/mper6206

Similar Articles

21-30 of 87

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.