Executive Functions in Institutionalized Children Without Parental Care

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59519/mper4001

Keywords:

children without parental care, institutionalized children, executive functions

Abstract

Institutional life of children without parental care is a significant risk factor for socio-emotional and cognitive development. Given that previous studies have focused mainly on behavioral characteristics, attachment, attention, speech and language skills, and intellectual functioning, the aim of this pilot study is to determine the level of executive functions (EF) development in institutionalized children with typical intellectual abilities.

The sample included twenty-four children, of both sexes (58.3% of boys; N = 14), aged between 8 and 15 years (AS = 13.5; M = 1.64). The BRIEF scale (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive function) was used to assess EF, and the results were analyzed in relation to the norms given in the manual.

The obtained results indicate that children living in the institution show significant deviations in the level of development of almost all assessed aspects of EF (between 25% and 83% of children depending on the subscale). Clinically significant values are manifested both in the field of behavior regulation and in the area of metacognition, which, judging by the results, is an area that is particularly sensitive to the institutional environment (about 70% of children deviate at least 1.5 SD from the average). In the field of metacognitive abilities, the most pronounced difficulties are detected on the subscale which assesses planning and organization (83.3%). As far as behavioral regulation is concerned, most pronounced difficulties are observed in the domain of behavioral flexibility (70.8%). Children living in institution for up to a year have tendency to achieve worse results than children who have longer institutional experience, and this difference is statistically significant regarding behavioral flexibility (p = 0.033). No gender differences in EF development were found in these children.

Having in mind the importance of EF for socio-emotional functioning, adaptive behavior and academic achievement, it is necessary to systemically include various stimulation programs that would be focused on developing metacognitive and regulatory abilities of children living in the institution.

References

1. Camuñas, N., Vaíllo, M., Mavrou, I., Brígido, M., & Quintana, M. P. (2020). Cognitive and behavioural profile of minors in residential care: The role of executive functions. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105507.

2. Carlson, S. M., Zelazo, P. D., & Faja, S. (2013). Executive function. In P. Zelazo (Ed), The Oxford Handbook of Developmental Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 743–796). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

3. Carrera, P., Jiménez-Morago, J. M., Román, M., & León, E. (2019). Caregiver ratings of executive functions among foster children in middle childhood: Associations with early adversity and school adjustment. Children and Youth Services Review, 106, 104495.

4. Cheung, K., Doyle, S., Clayton, K., & Taylor, N. M. (2022). The Association Between Performance-Based Measures and Caregiver Ratings of Executive Functioning Among Children with Prenatal Alcohol Exposure. Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology, 8(1), 32-44.

5. Chugani, H. T., Behen, M. E., Muzik, O., Juhász, C., Nagy, F., & Chugani, D. C. (2001).

Local brain functional activity following early deprivation: a study of postinstitutionalized Romanian orphans. Neuroimage, 14(6), 1290-1301.

6. Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168.

7. Gioia, G. A., Isquith, P. K., Guy, S. C., & Kenworthy, L. (2000). The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

8. Fay-Stammbach, T., & Hawes, D. J. (2019). Caregiver ratings and performance-based indices of executive function among preschoolers with and without maltreatment experience. Child Neuropsychology, 25(6), 721-741.

9. Fearon, P. R. M., & Belsky, J. (2004). Attachment and attention: Protection in relation to gender and cumulative social‐contextual adversity. Child Development, 75(6), 1677-1693.

10. Gioia, G. A., Kenworthy, L., & Isquith, P. K. (2010). Executive function in the real world: BRIEF lessons from Mark Ylvisaker. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 25(6), 433-439.

11. Gligorović, M., & Buha, N. (2002). Govor kod dece bez roditeljskog staranja. Beogradska defektološka škola, 3, 140-153.

12. Hodel, A. S., Hunt, R. H., Cowell, R. A., Van Den Heuvel, S. E., Gunnar, M. R., & Thomas, K. M. (2015). Duration of early adversity and structural brain development in post-institutionalized adolescents. NeuroImage, 105, 112-119.

13. Isquith, P. K., Crawford, J. S., Espy, K. A., & Gioia, G. A. (2005). Assessment of executive function in preschool‐aged children. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 11(3), 209-215.

14. Kochanska, G., Murray, K. T., & Harlan, E. T. (2000). Effortful control in early childhood: continuity and change, antecedents, and implications for social development. Developmental Psychology, 36(2), 220.

15. Liston, C., McEwen, B. S., & Casey, B. J. (2009). Psychosocial stress reversibly disrupts prefrontal processing and attentional control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(3), 912-917.

16. Lurija, A. R. (2000). Jezik i svest. Beograd: zavod za udžbenika i nastavna sredstva.

17. Maclean, K. (2003). The impact of institutionalization on child development. Development and Psychopathology, 15(4), 853-884.

18. Malarbi, S., Abu-Rayya, H. M., Muscara, F., & Stargatt, R. (2017). Neuropsychological functioning of childhood trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 72, 68-86.

19. Matejić-Đuričić, Z. (1994). Senzomotorna inteligencija i socijalno posredovanje. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.

20. McCabe, L. A., Cunnington, M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2004). The development of self-regulation in young children: Individual characteristics and environmental contexts. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Handbook of Self-regulation (pp. 340-356). NY: The Guilford Press.

21. McCall, R. B. (2013). The consequences of early institutionalization: can institutions be improved?–should they?. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 18(4), 193-201.

22. Merz, E. C., & McCall, R. B. (2011). Parent ratings of executive functioning in children adopted from psychosocially depriving institutions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(5), 537-546.

23. Merz, E. C., & McCall, R. B. (2010). Behavior problems in children adopted from psychosocially depriving institutions. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(4), 459-470.

24. Mischel, W., & Ayduk, O. (2004). Willpower in a cognitive-affective processing system: The dynamics of delay of gratification. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Handbook of Self-regulation (pp. 99-129). NY: The Guilford Press.

25. Noble, K. G., McCandliss, B. D., & Farah, M. J. (2007). Socioeconomic gradients predict individual differences in neurocognitive abilities. Developmental Science, 10(4), 464-480.

26. Plessow, F., Fischer, R., Kirschbaum, C., & Goschke, T. (2011). Inflexibly focused under stress: acute psychosocial stress increases shielding of action goals at the expense of reduced cognitive flexibility with increasing time lag to the stressor. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3218-3227.

27. Savage, J., Brodsky, N. L., Malmud, E., Giannetta, J. M., & Hurt, H. (2005). Attentional functioning and impulse control in cocaine-exposed and control children at age ten years. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 26(1), 42-47.

28. Sloutsky, V. M. (1997). Institutional care and developmental outcomes of 6-and 7-year-old children: A contextualist perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20(1), 131-151.

29. Strömland, K., Ventura, L. O., Mirzaei, L., Fontes de Oliveira, K., Marcelino Bandim, J., Parente Ivo, A., & Brandt, C. (2015). Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders among children in a Brazilian orphanage. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 103(3), 178-185.

30. Van IJzendoorn, M. H., Palacios, J., Sonuga‐Barke, E. J., Gunnar, M. R., Vorria, P., McCall, R. B., ... & Juffer, F. (2011). I. Children in institutional care: Delayed development and resilience. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 76(4), 8-30.

31. Welsh, M. C. (2001). The prefrontal cortex and the development of executive functions. In A. Kalverboer & A. Gramsbergen (Eds.), Handbook of Brain and Behaviour Development (pp. 767-789). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

32. Wretham, A. E., & Woolgar, M. (2017). Do children adopted from British foster care show difficulties in executive functioning and social communication?. Adoption & Fostering, 41(4), 331-345.

33. Zeanah, C. H., Egger, H. L., Smyke, A. T., Nelson, C. A., Fox, N. A., Marshall, P. J., & Guthrie, D. (2009). Institutional rearing and psychiatric disorders in Romanian preschool children. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166(7), 777-785.

Published

17.09.2022

How to Cite

Executive Functions in Institutionalized Children Without Parental Care. (2022). Multidisciplinarni Pristupi U Edukaciji I Rehabilitaciji, 4(4), 9-22. https://doi.org/10.59519/mper4001

Similar Articles

1-10 of 109

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.