Social Distance of General Population Towards the Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59519/mper2006Keywords:
intellectual disabilities, social distance, age, genderAbstract
Introduction Social distance is frequently used as an indicator for discrimination and refers to the tendency of people to avoid contact with stigmatised populations, including people with intellectual disabilities. Aim To explore the level of social distance among general population towards the individuals with intellectual disabilities and investigate the significant correlates.
Methods This cross-sectional study was carried out in family medicine outpatient departments of the Primary Health Care Centre of Sarajevo Canton. The study included 240 respondents. The research instruments included general socio-demographic data questionnaire and social distance scale (modified Bogardus scale).
Results The median value of the social distance scale was 17 (minimum, 6; maximum, 30; interquartile range, 0–2). The level of social distance increases if situations imply ‘social closeness.’. The closest social relationships (marriage) are at the top of the scale. Male participants held attitudes that reflected greater social distance than female (p= 0.016). Older participants expressed greater s social distance than younger, but not statistically significant (p= 0.323).
Conclusion While current practices strive to include individuals with intellectual disabilities in community opportunities, stigmatizing attitudes held by the public can be a barrier to achieving true social inclusion.
References
1. Bouras, N., & Jacobson, J. (2002) Mental health care for people with mental retardation: A global perspective. World Psychiatry, 1,162–165.
2. World Health Organization. (1992). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision. Geneva: World Health Organization.
3. Schalock, R.L. (Ed..). (2010). Intellectual disability: definition, classification, and systems of supports, 11th ed. Washington: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
4. Haneš, O. (2012). Sociodemografske karakteristike, socijalne distance i stereotipi kod studenata u Banjaluci. Primenjena psihologija, 6(1), 59-79.
5. Ouellette-Kuntz, H., Burge, P., Brown, H.K., Arsenault, E. (2010). Public attitudes towards individuals with intellectual disabilities as measured by the concept of social distance. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 23(2): 132–142.
6. Rot, N. (2010). Osnovi socijalne psihologije. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike Beograd.
7. Bogardus, E. S. (1925). Measuring social distances. Journal of applied sociology, 9, 299-308.8. Havelka, N.., Kuzmanović, B., & Popadić, D. (2004). Metode i tehnike socijalnopsiholoških istraživanja. Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju Društva psihologa Srbije.
9. Wark, C., & Galliher, J. (2007). Emory Bogardus and the Origins of the Social Distance Scale. The American Sociologist. 38. 383-395
10. Šlezak, H., & Šakaja, L. (2012). Prostorni aspekti socijalne distance prema Romima. Hrvatski geografski glasnik, 74(1), 91-109.
11. Link, B.G., Yang, L.H,, Phelan, J.C., Collins P.Y. (2004). Measuring Mental Illness Stigma. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30 (3), 511–541,
12. Wilson, M.C., & Scior, K. (2015). Implicit Attitudes towards People with Intellectual Disabilities: Their Relationship with Explicit Attitudes, Social Distance, Emotions and Contact. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0137902.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amira Kurspahić-Mujčić, Amra Mujčić (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
