Innovative and Handcrafted Low-Tech Assistive Tools: The Experiences of Kindergarten Educators and Their Role in Early Childhood Development

Authors

  • Aleksandra Jakovchevska Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje image/svg+xml Author
  • Natasha Chichevska Jovanova Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59519/mper7204

Keywords:

Assistive technology, Early intervention, Children with disabilities, Inclusive education

Abstract

This study aims to explore how kindergarten educators manually develop and use low-tech assistive technology (AT). Low-tech AT refers to simple, inexpensive devices designed to help children who have certain developmental disabilities. The research uses a combined approach of quantitative and qualitative research techniques. Through surveys of educators we collected quantitative data related to hand-designed ATs, while interviews provided qualitative insights into the motivations, challenges and experiences of teachers with these tools, we also analyzed the content of hand-created low-tech ATs through a checklist. The results show that handmade low-tech ATs significantly impact and benefit children's engagement, development and progress, especially in communication and motor skills. Educators also emphasized the importance of applying these tools in the early intervention process, noting improvements in more developmental aspects of children. The discussion highlights the need for additional resources and training to help educators create and implement effective AT devices, as well as the role of creativity in emphasizing the individual needs of students.

References

Angraeni, N., & Listiana, A. (2023). The role of contemporary pedagogical technology in ECE: A systematic literature review. The Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v6i1.55648

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bryant, B., & Crews, P. (1998). The technology-related assistance to individuals with disabilities act: relevance to individuals with learning disabilities and their advocates. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(1).

Buning, M., Hammel, J., Schmeler, M., & Doster, S. (2004). Assistive technology within occupational therapy practice. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(6), 678–680.

Catts, H. W., Nielsen, D. C., & Bontempo, D. E. (2014). Early identification of reading disabilities within an RTI framework. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(3), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413498115

Catts, H. W., Nielsen, D. C., & Liu, Y. (2015). Early identification of reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(5), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414556121

Cook, A. M., & Hussey, S. M. (2002). Assistive technology: Principles and practices (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

Dimitrova-Radojichikj, D., Chichevska-Jovanova, N., & Rashikj Canevska, O. (2016). Attitudes of the Macedonian preschool teachers toward students with disabilities. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 62(2).

Duhaney, L. M., & Duhaney, D. C. (2000). Assistive technology: Meeting the needs of learners with disabilities. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(4), 393–402.

Fetters, M., Curry, L., & Creswell, J. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs: Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117

Goldstein, S., & Naglieri, J. (2011). Encyclopedia of child behavior and development. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9

Guzzetti, B., & Yang, X. (2010). Title forthcoming. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Hatch, M. (2014). The maker movement manifesto: Rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. McGraw-Hill Education.

Hook, J., Verbaan, S., Durrant, A. C., Olivier, P., & Wright, P. C. (2014). A study of the challenges related to DIY assistive technology in the context of children with disabilities. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598530

Jadhav, V., Chambers, D., & Tatpuje, D. (2020). Low-tech assistive technology to support students with disability in low-income countries. In Assistive Technology to Support Inclusive Education. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787695191

Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2010). DIY media: Creating, sharing and learning with new technologies. New York: Peter Lang.

Lersilp, S., Putthinoi, S., & Okahashi, S. (2018). Information management for the assistive technology provision in community: Perspectives of local policymakers and health service providers. Occupational Therapy International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8019283

Lewis, R. B. (1993). Special education technology: Classroom applications. Brooks/Cole: Pacific Grove.

Manero, A., Smith, P., Sparkman, J., Dombrowski, M., Courbin, D., Kester, A., Womack, I., & Chi, A. (2019). Implementation of 3D printing technology in the field of prosthetics: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091641

McCulloch, L. (2004). Assistive technology: A special education guide to assistive technology. Montana Office of Public Instruction (1–37).

Mohajan, H. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7, 23–48. https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571

Ogegbo, A. A., & Aina, A. Y. (2022). Fostering the development of 21st-century competencies through technology in young children: Perceptions of early childhood educators. Education and New Developments 2022, 323–327. https://doi.org/10.36315/2022v2end073

Anggraeni, N., & Listiana, A. (2023). The role of contemporary pedagogical technology in ECE: A systematic literature review. The Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v6i1.55648

Dimitrova-Radojichikj, D., Chichevska-Jovanova, N., & Rashikj Canevska, O. (2016). Attitudes of the Macedonian preschool teachers toward students with disabilities. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 62(2).

Hatch, M. (2014). The maker movement manifesto: Rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. McGraw-Hill Education.

Hook, J., Verbaan, S., Durrant, A. C., Olivier, P., & Wright, P. C. (2014). A study of the challenges related to DIY assistive technology in the context of children with disabilities. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598530

Jadhav, V., Chambers, D., & Tatpuje, D. (2020). Low-tech assistive technology to support students with disability in low-income countries. In Assistive Technology to Support Inclusive Education. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787695191

Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2010). DIY media: Creating, sharing and learning with new technologies. New York: Peter Lang.

Lersilp, S., Putthinoi, S., & Okahashi, S. (2018). Information management for the assistive technology provision in community: Perspectives of local policymakers and health service providers. Occupational Therapy International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8019283

Manero, A., Smith, P., Sparkman, J., Dombrowski, M., Courbin, D., Kester, A., Womack, I., & Chi, A. (2019). Implementation of 3D printing technology in the field of prosthetics: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091641

McCulloch, L. (2004). Assistive technology: A special education guide to assistive technology. Montana Office of Public Instruction (1–37).

Ogegbo, A. A., & Aina, A. Y. (2022). Fostering the development of 21st-century competencies through technology in young children: Perceptions of early childhood educators. Education and New Developments 2022, 323–327. https://doi.org/10.36315/2022v2end073

Tzouriadou, M., Vouyoukas, C., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Michalopoulou, L. E. (2015). Early intervention of kindergarten children at risk for developmental disabilities: A Greek paradigm. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 3(3), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598/15

Swai, E. A., Msuya, S. E., Moshi, H., Lindkvist, M., Sörlin, A., & Sahlén, K. G. (n.d.). Children and adolescents with physical disabilities: Describing characteristics and disabilityrelated needs in the Kilimanjaro region, north-eastern Tanzania – A cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-XXXX

Tzouriadou, M., Vouyoukas, C., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Michalopoulou, L. E. (2015). Early intervention of kindergarten children at risk for developmental disabilities: A Greek paradigm. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 3(3), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598/15

World Health Organization. (2018). Global report on assistive technology. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049451

Downloads

Published

19.12.2025

How to Cite

Innovative and Handcrafted Low-Tech Assistive Tools: The Experiences of Kindergarten Educators and Their Role in Early Childhood Development. (2025). Multidisciplinarni Pristupi U Edukaciji I Rehabilitaciji, 7(10), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.59519/mper7204

Similar Articles

1-10 of 128

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.