The Importance of Alternative and Augmentative Communication for Children and Adults With Disabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59519/mper4022Keywords:
alternative and augmentative communication, modern technology, children and adults with disabilitiesAbstract
Alternative and Augmentative Communication (AAC) is an area of clinical practice that addresses the needs of individuals with significant and complex communication impairments characterized by impaired production and/or comprehension of spoken language, including spoken and written modes of communication. Augmentative communication is used to supplement existing speech, and alternative communication is used instead of speech that is not functional or not present at all (Ibrahimagić, A., 2019). Communication is a very important factor for shaping society. It is one of the basic human rights. The essence of communication is the ability to convey our thoughts, feelings and desires. Every child and adult has the right to communicate. Children and people with disabilities mostly have communication difficulties. That is why they need help to be included in activities of daily living. Modern technology enables an easier and better life for children and people with disabilities. In schools, children with disabilities use AAC to facilitate participation in the teaching process, which enables them better interaction with other students and their teachers, and makes it easier for them to understand and adopt the material. AAC enables adults better involvement in everyday life activities, giving them equal employment opportunities. The aim of our paper is to show what alternative and augmentative communication is and to explain the importance of AAC for children and adults with disabilities.
References
1. Allen AA., Svhlosser RW, Brock KL., Shane HC. (2017): The effectiveness of aided augmented input techniques for persons with developmental disabilities: a siystematic review. Alugmentative Alternative Communication.
2. Beukelman DR, Mirenda P. (2013): Augmentative an Alternative Communication: Supporting Children and Adults with Complex Communication Needs. Maryland: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
3. Chung YC, Stoner JB (2016) A Meta – Synthesis of Team Members Voices: What We Need and What We Do to Support Students Who Use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication.
4. Creer S., Enderby P., Judge S., John A. (2016): Prevalence of people who could benefit from augmentative and alternative communication in the UK: determing the need. Int J lang Commun Disord.
5. Drager K., Light J., McNaughton D. (2010): Effects of AAC interventions communication and language for young children with complex communication needs. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine.
6. Ibrahimagić A. (2019): Augmentativna i alternativna komunikacija. Printcom.Tuzla.
7. Johnston S., Reichle J., Feeley K., Jones E. (2012): Augmentative and alternative communication strategies for individuals with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Pau H. Brookes.
8. Morin KL, Ganz JB, Gregori EV, Foster MJ, Gerow SL, Genc – Tosun D, Hong ER (2018): A systematic quality review if high – tech AAC interventions as an ed+vidence – based practice
9. Nigam R. (2006): Sociocultural development and validation of lexicon for Asian – Indian individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol.
10. Russo MJ, Prodan V, Meda NN, Carcavallo L, Muracioli A, Sabe L, Bonamico L, Allegri RF Olmos L. (2017): High – technology augmentative communication for adults with post – stroke aphasia: a systematic review: Expert Review of Medical Devices.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Merima Dramalija, Rasema Begović Lukač (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
