Specific Learning Difficulties: Definition, Prevalence and Etiology

Authors

  • Bojana Vuković University of East Sarajevo image/svg+xml Author
  • Slađana Ćalasan University of East Sarajevo image/svg+xml Author
  • Andrea Vegar University of Mostar image/svg+xml Author
  • Jelena Vidojević JPU “Dječiji vrtić, Gacko Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59519/mper4019

Keywords:

specific learning difficulties, dyslexia, dysgraphia, dyscalculia

Abstract

Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) is an umbrella term, encompassing certain categories in relation to a specific aspect of learning that is affected. Definitions of specific learning difficulties have changed over time, resulting in inconsistencies in research and legislative frameworks. However, according to the new The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), which provides a widely accepted definition that is increasingly used in research and it is accepted by important parties which are in charge for rights of associations of people with specific learning disabilities, in this category are include dyslexia, dysgraphia as well as dyscalculia. SLD can be diagnosed if one difficulty is present in one or all three domains despite conventional schooling, normal hearing and vision, normal intelligence, adequate motivation, and adequate socio-cultural opportunities. For decades, researchers have been trying to provide an adequate definition, operationalize diagnostic criteria, in order to create instruments and investigate the exact prevalence, and shed light on the etiological factors of these difficulties. A comprehensive model of specific learning difficulties must take both into account; isolated learning disorders as well as comorbidities between them. However, specific learning difficulties, although they may occur together, are characterized by different underlying deficits and therefore each domain requires a separate approach. Given this, the aim of our work is to review previous achievements in this field, so that we have a clear starting point for further research work.

References

1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). DSM Diagnostic and Statistical – Manual (5th edn).

2. Badian, N. A. (1983). Arithmetic and nonverbal learning. Progress in learning disabilities, 5, 235-264.

3. Banai, K., & Ahissar, M. (2004). Poor frequency discrimination probes dyslexics with particularly impaired working memory. Audiology and Neurotology, 9(6), 328-340.

4. Ben- Artzi, E., Fostick, L.,& Babkoff, H.(2005). Deficits in temporal-order judgements in dyslexia: Evidence from diotic stimuli differing spectrally and from dichotic stimuli differing only by perceived location. Neuropsychologia, 43(5), 714-723.

5. Berninger, V. W. (2008). Defining and differentiating dysgraphia, dyslexia, and language learning disability within a working memory model. Brain, behavior, and learning in language and reading disorders, 103-134.

6. Berninger, V., & Richards, T. (2010). Inter-relationships among behavioral markers, genes, brain and treatment in dyslexia and dysgraphia. Future Neurology, 5(4), 597-617.

7. British Dyslexia Association.(2007). Preuzeto 21.05. 2022. sa:www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/educator/what-are-specific-learning-difficulties

8. Cardoso, M. H.; Capellini S.A. (2016) Identification and characterization of dysgraphia in students with learning difficulties and learning disorders. Disturb Comun, Vol 281, 27- 36.

9. European Dyslexia Association (2007). Preuzeto 21.06.2022 sa: https://eda-info.eu/what-is-dyslexia/

10. Everatt, J., & Elbeheri, G. (2008). Dyslexia in different orthographies: Variability in transparency. The Sage handbook of dyslexia, 427-439.

11. Frith, U. (1999). Paradoxes in the definition of dyslexia. Dyslexia, 5(4), 192-214.

12. Grizzle, K. L., & Simms, M. D. (2009). Language and learning: a discussion of typical and disordered development. Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care, 39(7), 168-189.

13. Gross‐Tsur, V., Manor, O., & Shalev, R. S. (1996). Developmental dyscalculia: Prevalence and demographic features. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 38(1), 25-33.

14. Gubbay, S. S., & de Klerk, N. H. (1995). A study and review of developmental dysgraphia in relation to acquired dysgraphia. Brain and Development, 17(1), 1-8.

15. Hawke,J.L.; Olson,R.K.; Willcutt,E.G.; Wadsworth,S.J.; DeFries, J.C.(2009). Gender ratios for reading difficulties. Dyslexia 15, 239–242.

16. Hein, J., Neumarker, K. J., & Bzufka, M. W. (2000). The specific disorder of arithmetical skills. Prevalence study in an urban population sample and its clinico-neuropsychological validation. Including a data comparison with a rural population sample study. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 9(2):87-101.

17. International Dyslexia Association (2002). Definit on of Dyslexia. International Dyslexia Association https://dyslexiaida.org/definition-of-dyslexia/

18. Ito, M. (2008). Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(4), 304-313.

19. Kaufmann, L., Mazzocco, M. M., Dowker, A., von Aster, M., Goebel, S., Grabner, R., ... & Nuerk, H. C. (2013). Dyscalculia from a developmental and differential perspective. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 516.

20. Lewis, C., Hitch, G. J., & Walker, P. (1994). The prevalence of specific arithmetic difficulties and specific reading difficulties in 9‐to 10‐year‐old boys and girls. Journal of child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(2), 283-292.

21. Molfese, V., Molfese, D., Molnar, A., & Beswick, J. (2006). Developmental dyslexia and dysgraphia. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (pp. 485-491). Elsevier Ltd.

22. Paracchini, S., Scerri, T., & Monaco, A. P. (2007). The Genetic Lexicon of Dyslexia. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 8(1), 57–79.

23. Parsons, S., Bynner, J (2005) Does numeracy matter more? National research and development centre for adult literacy and numeracy. Institute of Education, London.

24. Ramaa, S., & Gowramma, I. P. (2002). A systematic procedure for identifying and classifying children with dyscalculia among primary school children in India. Dyslexia, 8(2), 67-85.

25. Rapcsak, S. Z., Beeson, P. M., Henry, M. L., Leyden, A., Kim, E., Rising, K., ... & Cho, H. (2009). Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates. Cortex, 45(5), 575-591.

26. Rotzer, S., Loenneker, T., Kucian, K., Martin, E., Klaver, P., & Von Aster, M. (2009).

Dysfunctional neural network of spatial working memory contributes to developmental dyscalculia. Neuropsychologia, 47(13), 2859-2865.

27. Shalev, R. S. (1997). Neuropsychological aspects of developmental dyscalculia. Mathematical Cognition, 3(2), 105-120.

28. Shalev, R. S., Manor, O., Kerem, B., Ayali, M., Badichi, N., Friedlander, Y., & Gross-Tsur, V. (2001). Developmental dyscalculia is a familial learning disability. Journal of learning disabilities, 34(1), 59-65.

29. Wagner, R. K., Zirps, F. A., Edwards, A. A., Wood, S. G., Joyner, R. E., Becker, B. J., ... & Beal, B. (2020). The prevalence of dyslexia: A new approach to its estimation. Journal of learning disabilities, 53(5), 354-365.

Published

17.09.2022

How to Cite

Specific Learning Difficulties: Definition, Prevalence and Etiology. (2022). Multidisciplinarni Pristupi U Edukaciji I Rehabilitaciji, 4(4), 237-247. https://doi.org/10.59519/mper4019

Similar Articles

51-60 of 64

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.