Application of Teletherapy in Speech Therapy

Authors

  • Katarina Pavičić Dokoza Polyclinic for the Rehabilitation of Listening and Speech SUVAG image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59519/mper3024

Abstract

Pandemic and lockdown have had a big impact on all segments of life, including the provision of health services. Although digital (telemedicine) technologies have been applied in the field of medicine for some time now, telerehabilitation in the field of speech and language pathology has mainly been associated with the provision of services in the US and Australia. In addition to the pandemic, the population of Croatia was also faced with the consequences of two devastating earthquakes during 2020, which further resulted in the need for rapid implementation of digital technologies in the process of rehabilitation and education. Research conducted by Dhawan (2020) states that the benefits of distance learning and rehabilitation systems are great flexibility of place and time of learning and rehabilitation, while the challenges are technical difficulties, inability to manage time effectively, distraction, and frustration caused by environmental factors. During 2020 the number of scientific researches aimed at the success of the provision of telerehabilitation has increased significantly as well as an assessment of the attitudes of telerehabilitation service providers (SLTs) and users (patients, parents, caregivers). The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the research on distance rehabilitation, especially in dealing with children with language-speech disorders and hearing impairment, as well as the results of its evaluation by the provider and users of telerehabilitation users. The analysis of the data supports the usage of teletherapy, i.e. distance rehabilitation has yielded very good results. Feedback from teletherapy service providers and users enables better structuring of current programs, didactic content, and methodical approaches in SLTs work to preserve a continuous, valid and timely speech and language service.

References

1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2019). Telepractice: Overview. https://www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Professional-Issues/Telepractice/

2. American Telemedicine Association, www.atmeda.org, pristupljeno 8. 4. 2021.

3. Cohn, E. R. (2012). Tele-ethics in telepractice for communication disorders. Perspectives on Telepractice, 2, 3-15. https://pubs.asha.org/doi/full/10.1044/tele2.1.3

4. Cole, B., Pickard, K., Stredler-Brown, A. (2019). Report on the use of telehealth in early intervention in Colorado: Strenghts and challenges with telehealth as a service delivery method. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 11(1): 33-40.

5. Boisvert, M., Lang, R., Andrianopoulos, M., Boscardin, M.L. (2010): Telepractice in the assessment and treatment of individualwith autism disorders: A systematic review. Dev Neurorehabilitation, 13(6):423-432.

6. Hall, N., Boisvert, M., & Steele, R. (2013). Telepractice in the assessment and treatment of individuals with aphasia: A systematic review. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 5(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2013.6119

7. Kuvač Kraljević J., Matić, A., & Pavičić Dokoza, K. (2020). Telepractice as a Reaction to the COVID-19 Crisis: Insights from Croatian SLP Settings. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 12(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2020.6325

8. World Health Organization (2016). Global Health Observatory (GHO) data - Telehealth: Analysis of third global survey on ehealth based on the reported data by countries. https://www.who.int/gho/goe/telehealth/en/

9. McGill, M., Noureal, N., & Siegel, J. (2019). Telepractice treatment of stuttering: A systematic review. Telemedicine and e-Health, 25(5), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2017.0319

10. Molini-Avejonas, D., Rondon-Melo, S., de La Higuera Amato, C. A., & Samelli, A. G. (2015). A systematic review of the use of telehealth in speech, language and hearing sciences. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 21(7), 367-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X15583215

11. Pirkić, S., Spudić, M. i Tadić, I. (2020). Rehabilitacija na daljinu u Dječjem vrtiću Poliklinike SUVAG za vrijeme pandemije virusa SARS-CoV-2 – prikaz prakse i evaluacija. Logopedija, 10 (2), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.31299/log.10.2.4

12. Plantak Vukovac, D. (2016). Employing educational video in Speech-Language telerehabilitation with children: insight from interviews with parents. Proceedings of EDULEARN16 Conference, 5435-5444.

13. Plantak Vukovac, D., Novosel-Herceg, T., & Orehovački, T. (2015). Users’ needs in telehealth speech-language pathology services. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Information Systems Development. Harbin, Hong Kong, SAR: Department of Information, Systems, 1-12.

14. Theodoras, D.G. (2017). Telepractice in Speech-Language Pathology: The evidence, the challenges and the future. Percpectives in Telepractice 1(1):10-21.

15. Weidner, K., & Lowman, J. (2020). Telepractice for adult speech-language pathology services: A systematic review. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 5(1), 326-338. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_PERSP-19-00146

Published

26.10.2021

How to Cite

Application of Teletherapy in Speech Therapy. (2021). Multidisciplinarni Pristupi U Edukaciji I Rehabilitaciji, 3(3), 299-307. https://doi.org/10.59519/mper3024